Delgado insisted that Gálvez show concrete evidence of the alleged investigation against him. Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez.

The representative of the Let’s Keep Making History coalition, Mario Delgado Carrillo, responded forcefully to Xóchitl Gálvez’s accusations during the third presidential debate.

Delgado described the accusations as a “faithful reflection of the decadence of the right in Mexico” and demanded that, if Gálvez has evidence, he present it publicly.

Response from Mario Delgado

Mario Delgado desafía a Xóchitl Gálvez
Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

Through a digital link from the Tlatelolco University Cultural Center, both Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo, representative of the Fuerza y Corazón por México coalition, and Mario Delgado, expressed their opinions on the Tercer Grado program regarding the confrontation of the presidential candidates.

Mario Delgado categorically rejected being the subject of any investigation by the United States government, denying Xóchitl Gálvez’s statements made during the presidential debate.

To reinforce his position, Delgado showed a poster stating that “the PRIAN has more imprisoned and fugitive governors than in office”, thus highlighting the legal and corruption problems that, according to him, are more prevalent in the parties that represent Xóchitl Gálvez .

Delgado insisted that Gálvez must demonstrate with concrete evidence the existence of any investigation against him, pointing out that unfounded accusations only seek to destabilize and create unfounded mistrust.

You might also be interested: Xóchitl Gálvez’s Sister Faces Possible 80-Year Sentence

Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

Comments by Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo

Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo, also present at the digital link, expressed her desire that Claudia Sheinbaum accept Xóchitl Gálvez’s proposal to hold an exclusive presidential debate between the two of them.

This proposal suggests a direct confrontation without intermediaries, which would allow both candidates to confront their ideas and proposals in a more clear and direct way.

Acosta Naranjo indicated that a debate between Sheinbaum and Gálvez could be beneficial for voters, as it would provide a unique opportunity to directly compare the visions and solutions of both candidates for the country’s problems.

Keep reading: Third Presidential Debate 2024: Beyond Words

Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

Context of the Debate

Mario Delgado desafía a Xóchitl Gálvez
Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

Xóchitl Gálvez’s accusations and Mario Delgado’s response occur in a context of high political tension in Mexico, where presidential candidates seek to consolidate their support and disqualify their adversaries.

The third presidential debate was a scenario where this strategy was evident, with Gálvez attacking Delgado and other representatives of the Let’s Keep Making History coalition.

Delgado’s insistence on presenting evidence is a strategy to discredit Gálvez’s accusations and strengthen his own position and that of his coalition.

At the same time, Acosta Naranjo’s proposal for a debate between the two main candidates could change the dynamics of the campaign, providing a new focus on the direct confrontation of ideas and proposals.

Political Implications

Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

Mario Delgado’s challenge to Xóchitl Gálvez to present evidence not only seeks to refute the accusations, but also to expose what he considers a lack of foundation in the right-wing criticism.

This approach aims to reaffirm the position of the Let’s Keep Making History coalition as a political force committed to transparency and justice.

Delgado’s response also reflects a broader strategy to consolidate support among his supporters and persuade undecided voters that accusations against his coalition are unfounded.

By insisting on the need for concrete evidence, Delgado attempts to project an image of integrity and trust in the electoral process.

On the other hand, the proposal of a direct debate between Sheinbaum and Gálvez could reconfigure the political landscape, offering voters a clear opportunity to evaluate the proposals and personalities of the two candidates.

This type of debate could accentuate the differences between the political visions and approaches of each candidate, helping voters make more informed decisions.

Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez: “If she has evidence, let her present it”

Mario Delgado’s response and Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo’s proposal illustrate the complexities and intensity of the presidential campaign in Mexico.

With elections approaching, every move and statement by candidates and their representatives is carefully calculated to maximize their impact and appeal to voters.

The insistence on the presentation of evidence and the possibility of a direct debate are strategies that could significantly influence the course of the campaign and the electoral results.

R. Mario Delgado challenges Xóchitl Gálvez

también podría interesarte

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *